Legal Opinion

Karen Dahn v. United States of America Maureen Ames and Keith Finley

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 22, 1996No. 94-4107PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

77 F.3d 492

77 A.F.T.R.2d 96-1335

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Karen DAHN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

United STATES of America; Maureen Ames and Keith Finley,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-4107.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toby J. Espinoza v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Burt v. WareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Ronald James, and Kay James v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Forma-Pack, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Paul Morrissey v. Alejandro MayorkasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  4. Peter J. Bresson (Transferee),petitioner-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API