Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Mahoning Auto Service Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFarr, J.

There is no dispute as to the facts, the action being brought by The Mahoning Auto Service Company, Inc., against Holloway, an attachment ■ issued, a motion to dissolve, motion overruled by the Justice of the Peace, and then an appeal taken to the Court of Common Pleas under §10259 GC, which reads as follows;

“Any time before judgment, upon reasonable notice to the plaintiff, the defendant may make a motion before the justice of the peace to discharge the attachment or release the property, money or credits attached or garnisheed, either or both. Any party to the action affected by the order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bazzoli v. LarsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Pullman Co. v. Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Rothman v. I. Seldin KnellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pilgrim Distributing Corp. v. Galsworthy, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API