Legal Opinion

Rothman v. I. Seldin Kneller

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVickery, P. J.

This cause comes into this court on a petition in error to the municipal court of the city of Cleveland, and the so-called judgment from which error is prosecuted was the overruling of a motion to discharge an attachment issued in the municipal court, based upon the statutory ground for attachment in having criminally or fraudulently contracted the obligation.

The property in question was attached in a pro ceeding in the municipal court, and the motion to discharge the attachment was made, which motion was overruled. The court entered a judgment ultimately sustaining the attachment, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neighbors v. Thistle Down Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Pullman Co. v. Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morris v. Investment Life Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Eaton Loan & Home Aid Co. v. WespiserOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Holloway v. Mahoning Auto Service Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API