Legal Opinion
Inland Diamond Products Co. v. Cherry Optical Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 28, 2023No. 1:20-cv-00352Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN INLAND DIAMOND PRODUCTS CO., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-C-352 CHERRY OPTICAL INC., Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff Inland Diamond Products Co. accuses Defendant Cherry Optical Inc. of infringing its patents,
U.S. Patent No. 8,636,360
(the ‘360 Patent) and
U.S. Patent No. 9,405,130
(the ‘130 Patent), which involve a method for forming a beveled lens for use with eyeglasses. This matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion will be granted, Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kendale L. Adams v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.