Legal Opinion

Click-to-Call Technologies v. Ingenio, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided August 4, 2021No. 1:12-cv-00465Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES LP, § Plaintiff § § v. § § Case No. 1:12-cv-00465-LY INGENIO, INC.; THRYV, INC.; ETHER, a § division of INGENIO, INC.; and INGENIO, § INC. d/b/a KEEN, § Defendants § REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO: THE HONORABLE LEE YEAKEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity, filed October 20, 2020 (Dkt. 194); Plaintiff Click-to-Call’s Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed November 10, 2020…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API