Legal Opinion
Dethlefsen v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1956No. Civ. 8894PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
In a proceeding before the State Board of Equalization, respondents were found guilty of selling liquor to a minor in violation of section 25658 of the Business and Professions Code. The board ordered that respondents’ off-sale license be suspended for 30 days. They applied for mandate to the superior court, which after a hearing set aside the findings and order of the board on the ground of insufficient evidence and remanded the cause for further proceedings. The board appeals.
The board found that on June 5, 1954, an employee of respondents sold an alcoholic beverage to one Anthony Sanchez…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Keane v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Young v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Conti v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brice v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- 5501 Hollywood, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Kirchhubel v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Farah v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.