Legal Opinion
Conti v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 3, 1952No. Civ. 15145PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
In proceedings before the State Board of Equalization on an accusation charging the sale of liquor to a minor the board ordered a 15-day suspension of the liquor license. This proceeding in mandamus was brought by the licensees to review the proceedings before the board. The attack on the suspension order was based on the claim that the evidence was insufficient to support it. The trial court so held.
The licensees sold a bottle of beer to a 19-year-old member of the Coast Guard on his presentation of an out-of-state motor vehicle driver’s license identifying a party over the age of 21. Soon…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Young v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3Cited by6 opinions
- 5501 Hollywood, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Keane v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Dethlefsen v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Raab v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.