Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hinson v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1916Published

Civil actioN tried at September. Term, 1916, of MeokleNbueg, before Justice, J. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appealed.

1Dissent

Clare, 0. J.,

dissenting: On 20 December, 1914, the plaintiff' was a hostler in the yards of the Southern Eailway Company, the lessee of the defendant, at Charlotte. Having finished his. work for the day, and it being nearly dark, he started home along the path which had been used by employees of the company for twenty years past. This path crossed a number of railroad tracks, on one of which there was a train of dead cars, standing on what is known as the “set-off” track. The ears ready for movement were on another track, known as the “pick-up” track. When the plaintiff came to the cars on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Purnell v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Ray v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Hudson v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Smith v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Zachary v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API