Legal Opinion

Smith v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, being in the employment of the lessee of the defendant, was on the date of the injury complained of sent to paint switch targets, and at the time of the injury was painting a target the center of which was 4 feet from the center of the west rail of the defendant's track. The flange of the switch target extended from the center of the target towards the rail 6 inches. The engine extended over the track and towards the switch target as follows: Tender frame 23 1/2 inches, punch pole 24 inches, the step between the engine and tender 29 (820) inches, and the cylinder 26 inches.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nichols v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Henze v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. McLamb v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Ray v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Erickson v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Moore v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Norman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Zachary v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Norman v. Charlotte Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API