Zachary v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The action is brought to recover damages for the negligent killing of Herbert H. Burgess, a fireman in the employment of the Southern Railway Company, the lessee of the defendant, at Selma N.C. 29 April, 1909.
These issues were submitted to the jury:
1. Was the intestate of the plaintiff killed by the negligence of the lessee of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.
2. Did the intestate of the plaintiff contribute to his death by his own negligence? Answer: No.
3. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $2,000.
From the judgment rendered defendant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Purnell v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Shoner v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Ray v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. PetersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grow v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913
- Baird v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Williams v. Randolph & Cumberland Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Williams v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Bourne v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.