Legal Opinion

Zachary v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action is brought to recover damages for the negligent killing of Herbert H. Burgess, a fireman in the employment of the Southern Railway Company, the lessee of the defendant, at Selma N.C. 29 April, 1909.

These issues were submitted to the jury:

1. Was the intestate of the plaintiff killed by the negligence of the lessee of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.

2. Did the intestate of the plaintiff contribute to his death by his own negligence? Answer: No.

3. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $2,000.

From the judgment rendered defendant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Purnell v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Shoner v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Ray v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. PetersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grow v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Baird v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Williams v. Randolph & Cumberland Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Williams v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Bourne v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API