State v. Young

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

¶ 1 Jeffrey Carl Young (defendant) appeals from the sentences imposed after he was convicted of possession of burglary tools and burglary. Defendant contends the sentencing court committed fundamental error by failing to comply with the requirements of Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 17 (Rule 17) in accepting his admissions to two prior *267historical felony convictions. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm defendant’s sentences.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 A grand jury indicted defendant on two counts of possession of burglary tools, both class six…