Legal Opinion

State v. Weinbrenner

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 26, 1990No. 1 CA-CR 89-1185, 1 CA-CR 89-1190PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CECIL B. PATTERSON, Judge.

This appeal ■ presents the sole issue of whether defendant properly was required to pay two $8.00 time payment fees pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-116 for crimes committed prior to the June 28, 1989, effective date of the statute. Because there are in excess of fifty cases now pending before Division One which raise the identical issue, we choose to dispose of this case via a published opinion. We find .that the trial court properly imposed the fee, and therefore affirm.

The facts for purposes of our review are straight forward. On July 17, 1989, Elizabeth Weinbrenner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. State Ex Rel. Collins v. SeidelArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. FletcherArizona Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hayden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. State of Arizona v. Reuben Renee CotaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. State v. BeckermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. State v. BeltranCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API