Legal Opinion
Wells v. Golden
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 1, 2001No. 99-SP-819PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Christopher Wells appeals the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that the District of Columbia Board of Parole2 acted improperly under *643the Youth Rehabilitation Act (YRA), D.C.Code §§ 24-901 et. seq., (2001), formerly D.C.Code §§ 24-801 et. seq., (1996), and the Board’s regulations in setting a parole reconsideration (“set-off’) date for January 10, 2007, ten years after the commencement of his sentence. The trial court denied the habeas petition -without a hearing, after the government responded that the Board has complete and unreviewable…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carey v. Crane Service Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. CrockettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hurd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Hurd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017