Legal Opinion

United States v. Crockett

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 2004No. 03-CO-749, 03-CO-750PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASHINGTON, Associate Judge:

In this case, we must decide whether the Superior Court of the District of Columbia has jurisdiction to enforce treatment under the D.C. Youth Rehabilitation Act 1 (‘Youth Act”) on behalf of an offender sentenced under the Act, where the offender is neither incarcerated within the District of Columbia nor in the custody of D.C. officials. Appellant United States challenges the trial court’s decision in which it ordered the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) to provide certain services to inmate appellee Wardell Crockett (“Crockett”) under the Youth Act. The United…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Muhammad v. CloseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. District of Columbia v. MorrisseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Alston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holloway v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Wallace G. Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Norris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API