Thousand v. Hedberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. Defendants submitted evidence in admissible form establishing as a matter of law that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956; Borrman v Bogold, 229 AD2d 949). “The burden then shifted to plaintiff to come forward with sufficient evidence to overcome defendant [s’] motion by demonstrating that [he] sustained a serious injury within the meaning of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Grasso v. AngeramiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Scheer v. KoubekNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Rhind v. NaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Calucci v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Paolini v. SienkiewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Lehigh Construction Group, Inc. v. AlmquistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Butera v. WoodhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- McCarthy v. HameedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.