Legal Opinion

Butera v. Woodhouse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this personal injury action arising from an automobile accident. Defendant’s submissions in support of the motion, including the affidavit and incorporated report of defendant’s medical expert, are sufficient to establish as a matter of law that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury, and plaintiff failed to meet his burden of raising a triable issue of fact (see, Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Grasso v. AngeramiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Thousand v. HedbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Lough v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dann v. YehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Tornabene v. PawlewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Joseph E. G. v. East Irondequoit Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API