Legal Opinion

Paolini v. Sienkiewicz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1999PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of Elizabeth A. Pakenham (plaintiff) on the ground that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Plaintiff alleged that her injuries constitute serious injuries under each of four categories. With respect to the allegation that plaintiff sustained a medically determined injury or impairment that prevented her from performing substantially all of the material…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Mulhauser v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Adetunji v. U-Haul Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baytsayeva v. ShapiroDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  2. Hackett v. DriverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Oberly v. Bangs Ambulance, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Dixon v. LaMorticellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. BARRES, LAURA v. RIKER, DAVID C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API