Independent Life & Accident Insurance v. Thornton
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Franicum, Judge.
The policy provides: “The agreement as to benefit under this policy shall be null and void if the insured’s death or injury results, directly or indirectly, from any of the following causes: (a) from the insured’s . . . committing or attempting to commit, while sane or insane, assault . . . or . . . (f) from intentional homicide or as a result from the intentional act or acts of any person or persons. If it *287can be proven to the satisfaction of the company that the insured was not the aggressor, exception (f) will be waived.” The defendant, through its counsel, argues that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Frazier v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Gaynok v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Neill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. MoweryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Allstate Insurance Company v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. BurkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WareCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.