Legal Opinion

Cumberland & Westernport Transit Co. v. Metz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 23, 1930No. [Nos 63, 64, October Term, 1929.]PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Suoait,’ J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We have here two appeals in one record, one by each of two defendants, from a joint judgment against them in favor of the plaintiff, appellee, in which the defendants assail each other much more vigorously than they resist the. cl aim of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was seriously and permanently injured while a passenger on a motor bus of the Cumberland & Westernport Transit Company, one of the appellants, as a result of a collision of the bus with the American Oil Company’s truck, and each of the appellants contends that it was the other’s…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Stokes v. SaltonstallSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DerbySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  3. Nelson v. SeilerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  4. Plumb v. . Richmond Light R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Smallwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Alston v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Langenfelder v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  5. Williams v. GraffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API