Legal Opinion

Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Searl

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 6, 2018No. AC38482PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

The defendants, Susan E. Searl and Randy A. Searl, doing business as Subway store number 34648, 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, effectively dismissing their motion to vacate an arbitration award for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and granting the application of the plaintiff, Doctor's Associates, Inc., to confirm that award. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court should have applied federal law, or alternatively New York law, instead of Connecticut law, in determining whether they timely filed their motion to vacate. We conclude that the court should have applied…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. National Football League Management Council v. National Football League Players Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v. LuckieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Levine v. Advest, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Soto v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  2. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc. v. Saint PaulConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  3. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc. v. Saint PaulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API