Legal Opinion

Maybury Shoe Co. v. Rochester Factory Holding Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 2, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

If it were assumed that the assignee became the lessor’s tenant by the latter’s acceptance of rent from it, yet the lessees remained liable for the rent accruing after the assignment, by reason of their personal covenant in the lease to pay the rent for the full term. LaSociété &c v. Owen, 79 N. H. 318, and cases cited; Novak v. Company, 84 N. H. 93, 96. The option in the lease for a longer term was for its extension, and not for a renewal. Its language is definite in this respect. Any claim that the option was for a renewal may not be sustained without disregard of the plain wording of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Novak v. Fontaine Furniture Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  2. La Société St. Jean Baptiste, Inc. v. OwenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Castle v. Double Time, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. J.G.M.C.J. Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  4. Castle v. Double Time, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API