Legal Opinion

Novak v. Fontaine Furniture Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 4, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The defendant contends that all liability for rent or for damages occasioned by the breach of the executory portion of the lease was terminated when the plaintiff resumed possession and control of the premises, since such conduct on the plaintiff’s part effected a surrender of the lease by operation of law. The statement in the agreement of facts that there was no waiver is interpreted to mean that the plaintiff did not in fact accept the defendant’s relin quishment of possession as a surrender. Where there is such acceptance the tenant is not liable for subsequent rent. Davis v. George, 67…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Monger v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Marshall v. John Grosse Clothing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bowen v. ClarkeOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Higgins v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Respini v. PortaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Emery v. Caledonia Sand and Gravel Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Maybury Shoe Co. v. Rochester Factory Holding Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  3. RAL Automotive Group, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  4. Deasy v. Dernham Co. (In Re Blondheim Modular Manufacturing, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1986
  5. Merjos v. WarrenNorfolk County Circuit Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API