Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Raleigh Farmers Market, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1965No. 466PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Plaintiff does not challenge, as premature, the appeal from the order purporting to settle the issues. Each party offered evidence to support its position on the question of compensation because of the closing of Race Track Road. In substance, the action of the parties amounted to a waiver of a jury trial, and the order was equivalent to a nonsuit with respect to Farmers prayer for affirmative relief.

Since the question we are asked to answer must ultimately be presented, and is in such form that an answer may be helpful to plaintiff in the performance of its duties in laying out other roads,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Warren v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  2. Glenn v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Tift County v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Department of Transportation v. HarkeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State Highway Commission v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API