In re M.C.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
In this appeal, we consider the application of well-established ethical rules requiring recusal where there is an appearance of lack of impartiality to current conditions brought about by technological developments where judges can receive instantaneous (and often unsolicited) electronic communications related to a pending judicial proceeding. Appellant, M.C., challenges the denial of his motion for recusal on the grounds that the trial judge was required to recuse herself under the 1995 Code of Judicial Conduct for the District of Columbia Courts because during trial…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Stephen T.YelvertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Plummer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Vent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
- In re Petition of A.O.T.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- v. RoehrsColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.