Legal Opinion

State v. Stubbs

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1996No. A-95-940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hannon, Judge.

Rick Stubbs was convicted of knowing and intentional abuse of a vulnerable adult through exploitation pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-386 (Reissue 1995). He appeals from his conviction, arguing that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain the jury’s verdict and that he was not brought to trial within the time allowed by the speedy trial statute Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1207 (Reissue 1995). We find that the evidence was insufficient to prove that Stubbs exploited the alleged victim or that the victim was a “vulnerable adult” as defined by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-371…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AlvarezNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. MantichNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. One 1985 Mercedes 190D AutomobileNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. CisnerosNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Danell Blevins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. BassetteNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. HerngrenNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. StubbsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Doe v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API