Legal Opinion

Ohio Valley Electric Railway Co. v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 14, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Boyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing.

The appellant (defendant below) owns and operates as a part of its electric railway system a railroad track on Elm street in the city of Ironton, Ohio. The almost unprecedented flood in the spring of 1913 lifted from its foundations a cottage house located- in the city of Ironton belonging to the appellee (plaintiff below) and *184deposited it in the center of Elm street at its junction with second street, completely covering and blockading the track of defendant. It remained in that position, according to the proof, between ten and fifteen days, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gates v. BlincoeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
  2. Reeder v. Anderson's AdministratorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baltimore Transit Co. v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  2. United States Torpedo Co. v. LinerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Heidelberg v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API