Legal Opinion
Baltimore Transit Co. v. Faulkner
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 10, 1941No. [Nos. 17 and 18, April Term, 1941.]PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.
James F. Faulkner and his son, Albert G. Faulkner, instituted these suits for damages against the Baltimore Transit Company for assault and battery alleged to have been committed upon them by employees of the company. The two cases were tried together, and the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in each case.
On April 16th, 1940, while Faulkner was driving with his son on Eutaw Street in Baltimore, his automobile was struck by another operated by Carl E. Micklich at the intersection of Lombard Street. No one was injured, and Micklich admitted that he was at fault. Faulkner,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. QuigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. JopesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. StrubeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BargerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Gaither v. BlowersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Smith v. Gray Concrete Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Richardson v. McGriffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Foy v. Giant Food Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Davis v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.