Legal Opinion

Wright v. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 1935No. 24640PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

The plaintiff in error, John H. Wright, plaintiff below, appeals to this court from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county, Okla., in favor of the defendant in error, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, a corporation, the defendant below. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The facts are these, substantially: Plaintiff (and another who need not be noticed further herein) entered into a written contract with one McCright, a builder, to construct .a hotel building, and defendant became surety upon McCright’s bond for the faithful performance of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Columbia Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Willoughby v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. Draper v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Fuqua v. Tulsa Masonic Bldg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Devery Implement Co. v. J.I. Case Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Hall v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Brown v. PatelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API