Legal Opinion
Moseley v. . Knott
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 15, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The determination of the question presented by this appeal involves the construction of the ninth item of the will of E. T. Moseley, from whom it is admitted the title descended. This item is expressed in the following language:
“I give and devise to my beloved daughter-in-law, Kate Vanstory Moseley, wife of .my beloved son, Laury Moseley, for and during- the term of her natural life, a certain tract or parcel of land (describing it), to have and to hold to her, the said Kate Yanstory Moseley, for and during the term of her natural life, and at her death to go to the heirs of my beloved son,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bowen v. Hackney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Witty v. WittySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Cullens v. . CullensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Cooley v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Baugham v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Williamson v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Williamson v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Turpin v. . JarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Rigsbee v. . RigsbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.