Rigsbee v. . Rigsbee
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
It will be noticed that plaintiffs and certain of the defendants appealed from the judgment. Only two briefs were filed, in which the formal division between plaintiffs and defendants is not observed. It is unnecessary to observe it in this opinion.
In another of its phases the will of A. M. Rigsbee was construed by this Court in an opinion reported as Haywood v. Rigsbee, 207 N.C. 684, 178 S.E. 102. The will is printed in full in that Report, beginning with page 686, and we refer to it, if further perusal may be desired.
Only the parts of the will directly bearing upon the question before us…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bowen v. Hackney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Hilliard v. . KearneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
- Witty v. WittySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Faison v. . MiddletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- McCallum v. . McCallumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Strickland v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Armstrong Ex Rel. Martin Ex Rel. Martin v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Saint Mary's School & Junior College, Inc. v. WinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949