Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Cox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 25, 1940PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Tbis case involves tbe construction of tbe following clause in tbe will of Patrick Williamson:

“I give and bequeath to my son, Henry Singler Williamson, all tbe balance of my land, to bave and to bold to bim and bis bodily beirs born in wedlock, if any, if no sucb beirs, tben to go back to bis nearest of blood kin.”

Henry Singler Williamson died without issue, leaving surviving bis widow and several nieces and nephews, children of deceased brothers and sisters, who are tbe plaintiffs in tbis action, and one surviving sister, Ellen W. Cox, tbe defendant.

Tbe plaintiffs contend that under tbe will…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Starnes v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Carroll v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Puckett v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Williams v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Bryant v. ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. House v. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. McCain v. WombleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API