Legal Opinion
Cooper Investments v. Conger
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 27, 1989No. 86CA0010PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUME, Judge.
In this action to enforce a written guaranty agreement for payment of a promissory note, defendants, Robert L. Conger, Thomas H. Stroh, and Jack W. Welsh (guarantors), appeal the judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Cooper Investments, Robert Rifkin, and Gerald Kernis (creditors). Guarantors assert that the trial court erred in rejecting their affirmative defense of discharge by reason of a September 1982 modification in the terms of the note. They further assert that the court erred in finding that they had waived any rights which the Uniform Commercial Code might otherwise have…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Community Manage. Ass'n of Colorado Sp. v. TousleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- FIRST NAT. BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE v. AbrahamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Lincoln v. Transamerica Investment Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- First National Bank of Denver v. CillessenColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
- Burkhardt v. Bank of America Et Al.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fodale v. Waste Management of Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- May v. Women's Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Silverberg v. ColantunoColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- AAR Aircraft & Engine Group, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Allen v. CoatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.