Legal Opinion
Rudolph v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 29, 1986No. 85-5722PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANCE, Circuit Judge:
The district court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint and denied leave to amend on the ground that neither the complaint before the court nor the proposed amended complaint stated a federal claim. We find the proposed complaint sufficient to state a claim and thus reverse.
I
This case stems from the travails of auto magnate John DeLorean. When DeLore-an’s ill-fated sports car production venture collapsed, investors in a limited partnership DeLorean set up (“DRLP”) lost their money. DRLP’s liquidating trustee, along with one investor, filed suit in the Southern District of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- FindWhat Investor Group v. FindWhat. ComCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Twiss v. KuryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- In Re Gas Reclamation, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.