Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Edmisten
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 5, 1980No. 80PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
On 1 November 1976, Nantahala Power and Light Company (Nantahala) applied to the North Carolina Utilities Commission for permission to raise its retail electric utility rates and to revise a purchased power cost adjustment clause applicable to such rates. Treating the matter as an application for a general rate increase under G.S. 62-133, the Commission ordered investigation, posting of notices, and held public hearings. The Attorney General on behalf of the consuming public of North Carolina, the Town of Bryson City, the County of Swain, and Henry J. Truett were allowed to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Central Kansas Power Co. v. State Corporation Comm.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Aluminum Company of America, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Tapoco, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation v. Utilities Commission of the State of North Carolina Robert K. Koger, Leigh M. Hammond, Sarah Lindsay Tate, John W. Winter, Edward B. Hipp, A. Hartwell Campbell, and Douglas O. Leary, in Their Respective Official Capacities as Chairman and Commissioners of the North Carolina Utilities Commission, Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General of North Carolina, Amicus Curiae, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and Local Union 309, Amicus Curiae. State of Tennessee, Tennessee Office of Economic and Community Development, and Aluminum Company of America, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Tapoco, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation v. Utilities Commission of State of North Carolina, Robert L. Koger, Leigh M. Hammond, Sarah Lindsay Tate, John W. Winter, Edward B. Hipp, A. Hartwell Campbell and Douglas O. Leary, in Their Respective Official Capacities as Chairman and Commissioners of the North Carolina Utilities Commission, Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General of North Carolina, Amicus Curiae, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and Local Union 309, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Conservation CouncilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. ThornburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.