Hampton v. Christensen
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Wal J. Tuska, Rigby & Rigby, P. F. Dunne, Walter H. Linforth, and Jackson Hatch, for Appellants. S. Rosenheim, Barna McKinne, and Jordan & Brann, for Respondents.
1Opinion
This is a consolidated action to enforce on the part of certain materialmen and laborers their liens against the property of appellant Charles Franzoi, upon a building contract entered into between him and the contractor, Christensen. The owner appeals from the judgment against him and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company likewise appeals from the judgment given against it upon the contractor's bond. The court found that the contract in all respects was valid and in compliance with the law concerning mechanics' liens, and that it…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. MatuszewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Shaughnessy v. American Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Stimson Mill Company v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.