Anderson v. Anderson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The sole issue presented upon this appeal is whether there is a defect in parties such that the demurrer was properly sustained.
There is no question but that all parties to the agreement are proper parties to this lawsuit. However, a complaint is not demurrable merely because proper parties are not before the court; the demurrer will be sustained only if necessary or indispensable parties have not been joined. Elliott v. Indemnity Ins. Co. (1930), 201 Wis. 445, 448, 230 N. W. 87; Borde v. Hake (1969), 44 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 170 N. W. 2d 768. If, as respondent alleges, a partnership was created by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elliott v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Karp v. Coolview of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Borde v. HakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Sullivan v. Ashland Light, Power & Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- De Wit v. LanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. WeinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Heck & Paetow Claim Service, Inc. v. HeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Skaar v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.