Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Anderson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1972No. 105PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The sole issue presented upon this appeal is whether there is a defect in parties such that the demurrer was properly sustained.

There is no question but that all parties to the agreement are proper parties to this lawsuit. However, a complaint is not demurrable merely because proper parties are not before the court; the demurrer will be sustained only if necessary or indispensable parties have not been joined. Elliott v. Indemnity Ins. Co. (1930), 201 Wis. 445, 448, 230 N. W. 87; Borde v. Hake (1969), 44 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 170 N. W. 2d 768. If, as respondent alleges, a partnership was created by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Karp v. Coolview of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Borde v. HakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Sullivan v. Ashland Light, Power & Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. De Wit v. LanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WeinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Heck & Paetow Claim Service, Inc. v. HeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Skaar v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API