Karp v. Coolview of Wisconsin, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The defendant claims the trial judge made no findings of fact and conclusions of law but is under the erroneous impression that when a trial judge makes an oral decision from the bench he must also state at that time all the findings of fact on which he bases his decision. In this case after the oral decision, the plaintiff’s attorney prepared written findings of fact and conclusions of law, submitted them to counsel, and presented them to the court. “When the trial judge signed such findings and conclusions they became the findings and the conclusions of the trial judge and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Galusha v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Kamuchey v. TrzesniewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Mann v. Erie Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- McDougald v. New Richmond Roller Mills Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Rylander v. LaursenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gorton v. Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Flambeau Products Corp. v. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- M & I Bank v. First American National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Hanna Mining Co. v. Minnesota Power and Light Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1983
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Thoreson Food Products, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.