Legal Opinion

Combs v. Leishman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 15, 1988No. Civ. A. 84-2094PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BRYANT, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs, as trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1950 Pension Plan and 1974 Pension Plan brought this action against defendant Lewis K. Leishman, doing business as Leishman Coal Company, to collect withdrawal liability allegedly owed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. Defendant Leishman has filed a third party action against Central Ohio Coal Company seeking indemnification and reimbursement. This matter is before the court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. I.A.M. National Pension Fund Benefit Plan C and Alan W. Skolnick v. Stockton Tri IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. I.A.M. National Pension Fund v. Clinton Engines Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. Combs v. Western Coal Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1985
  5. Grand Union Company v. Food Employers Labor Relations Association and United Food & Commercial Workers Pension Fund Grand Union Company v. Food Employers Labor Relations Association and United Food & Commercial Workers Pension Fund Grand Union Company v. Food Employers Labor Relations Association and United Food & Commercial Workers Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Trustees of Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust v. Allied Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. v. Central States Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. O'CONNOR v. DeBolt Transfer, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Canario v. Lidelco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API