Legal Opinion
I.A.M. National Pension Fund Benefit Plan C and Alan W. Skolnick v. Stockton Tri Industries
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 16, 1984No. 83-1290PublishedCited by 150 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge STARR.
STARR, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises several issues under the federal statutes regulating employers’ withdrawal from participation in multiem-ployer pension plans. The case had its genesis when appellant, a large national pension fund, brought this action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to collect withdrawal liability under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1381 et seq., from Stockton TRI Industries (“Stockton” or “the Company”), a California-based corporation.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Wilbur v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Hidalgo v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 v. Centra, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Caspar W. Weinberger, National Council of State Agencies for the Blind v. Caspar W. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Avocados Plus Inc v. Veneman, Ann M.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.