David B. Findlay, Inc. v. Findlay
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentBurke, J.
This court decided in Meneely v. Meneely (62 N. Y. 427, 431-432) more than 90 years ago — and the rule, well settled then, has been consistently followed ever since — that “ every man has the absolute right to use his own name in his own business, even though he may thereby interfere with or injure the business of another person bearing the same name, provided he does not resort to any artifice or contrivance for the purpose of producing the impression that the establishments are identical, or do anything calculated to mislead. Where the only confusion created is that which results from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Meneely v. . MeneelyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Henry Romeike, Inc. v. Albert Romeike & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Wholesale Service Supply Corp. v. Wholesale Building Materials Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.