Legal Opinion

United States National Life & Casualty Co. v. Heard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 28, 1931No. 19866PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

Laura Heard, the defendant in error, as plaintiff, brought thijs action against the United States National Life & Casualty Company, to recover on an insurance policy. The policy was issued to Edith Robison on the 21st day of December, 1925. She died June 1, 1927. The plaintiff is the beneficiary. The policy is what is known as an Industrial Insurance Policy and was issued under the Industrial Insurance Act of 1923. The policy lapsed for nonpayment of the premium January 10, 1927, but was reinstated March 3, 1927. With reference to reinstatement the policy contains this provision :

“Policies…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mellor v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Sprouse v. MagesIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Baxter v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Owen v. United States Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Calley v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Industrial Commission v. WarnkeOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Oklahoma Protective Ass'n v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API