Industrial Commission v. Warnke
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The question presented for our determination is whether it is competent for a widow, claiming the benefit extended to her by the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Ohio, to waive the protection of the privileged communications statute (Section 11494, General Code), and to permit her husband’s attending physician to testify concerning the former’s physical condition at different times during’ the course of treatment.
Section 1465-91, General Code, provides that no compensation shall be paid a claimant on account of an occupational disease unless a medical advisor appointed by the Industrial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. WilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Olson v. Court of HonorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Groll v. TowerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- In Re the Estate of ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Calley v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- In Re Estate of WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Wilson v. ThorntonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Parisky, Admr. v. PierstorffOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.