Legal Opinion

Wilcons v. Penn Mut. Life Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1937No. 1448PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, a farmer residing upon and conducting farming operations on a 400-acre farm in Sedgwick County, Kansas, filed his petition and schedules on January 13, 1936, under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended (11 U.S.C.A. § 203). He named The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia and The Equitable Life Assurance Society of New York City in his schedules as his only secured creditors, holding mortgages on his entire farm, one covering 240 acres and the other 160 acres. His schedules disclosed that each mortgage had been foreclosed in the Sedgwick…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Pollard v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Barnet v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Foltz v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McWilliams v. BlackardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Heldstab v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  3. In re NossmanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1938
  4. Wilcons v. Penn Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. Lamb v. Ralston Purina CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API