Legal Opinion

Territory of Arizona v. Barth

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1887No. Crim. No. 42PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a Judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. The- facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

This was an indictment against defendant, Solomon Barth, accusing him of the crime of forgery of a county warrant, with a count for uttering said forged warrant. Defendant urges as error the refusal of the court to quash the indictment for irregularity in the formation of the grand jury. Defendant was present at the time the grand jury was impaneled, and.given an opportunity for challenge, which he declined to accept, on the ground that he had not been held to bail for this offense, and was under no accusation. Leaving the question whether he has waived his right of challenge, we will…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Commonwealth v. CostleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. People v. FinleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Batten v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. State v. BridgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. PortilloArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hash v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  3. United States v. MitchellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1905
  4. State v. CaseyNevada Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State v. CarterArizona Supreme Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API