Legal Opinion

Carnegie Steel Co. v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 11, 1908No. 2,632PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

This was a bill brought by the Carnegie Steel Company against the Colorado Fuel & Iron Company for an injunction and account, claimed to be the appropriate remedy for the infringement of a patent. The bill was filed in the court below on March 12, 1906. It made a showing that the patent would expire by its own limitation on June 3, 1906; that the public generally had recognized and acquiesced in the validity of the patent, and that its validity had been sustained by the judgment of a court of concurrent jurisdiction in a contested action on its merits; that such judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Clark v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Beedle v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Busch v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lewis Pub. Co. v. WymanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  2. Snead v. SchebleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  3. Wayman v. Louis Lipp Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1912
  4. American Sulphite Pulp Co. v. Crown-Columbia Pulp & Paper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API