Wayman v. Louis Lipp Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
In Equity. Suit by Edwin R. Wayman against the Louis Lipp Company for infringement of letters patent No. 633,941, for a dredger for pulverulent material, granted to James W. Arrott, Jr., September 26, 1899. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLISTER, District Judge.
The action is for infringement of a
patent, and came on to be heard on complainant’s motion for a preliminary injunction. The patent is for a mechanical dredger or sieve used in distributing finely powdered ingredients upon red-hot metal for the purpose of forming an enamel thereon, and, though simple, is ingenious and highly useful. Its validity has been sustained in two jurisdictions—Arrott v. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. (C. C.) 131 Fed. 457; Standard Sanitary Co. v. Arrott, 135 Fed. 750, 68 C. C. A. 388; Standard Sanitary Co. v. Mott Iron Works (C. C.) 152 Fed. 635;…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Twentieth Century Machinery Co. v. Loew Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Searchlight Horn Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1919
- Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. Iron City Sanitary Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915