Legal Opinion

Lipson v. Socony-Vacuum Corporation

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 9, 1935No. 2960, 2961PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Circuit Judge.

These cases come to this court on appeal from a judgment for the defendant in each case, the District Court having-sustained demurrers to the plaintiff’s declarations. All allegations of fact in the declarations on which the right of action depends are practically the same in .both cases. The cases were argued together arid may bé disposed of in one opinion. • .

The actions were brought under sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Clayton Act (15 USCA §§ 13, 14, 15). Section 2 declares it to be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Local 167, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arthur v. Kraft-Phenix Cheese CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938
  2. Lipson v. Socony Vacuum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
  3. Alexander v. Texas CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1957
  4. Kay Petroleum Corp. v. PiergrossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Alexander v. Texas CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API