Lipson v. Socony Vacuum Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Circuit Judge.
These are actions at law to recover treble damages under sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730 (15 U.S. C.A. §§ 13, 14 and 15). Since the allegations in each case are the same, they may be disposed of in one opinion.
Both cases were previously before this court on appeal from the ruling of the District Court sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s declarations. The rulings of the District Court were sustained [76 F.(2d) 213] on the ground that the alleged unlawful acts of the defendant did not appear to have been done in the course of interstate commerce;…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jewel Tea Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Package Closure Corporation v. Sealright Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Walling v. Goldblatt Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Brosious v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Alabama Independent Service Station Ass'n v. Shell Petroleum Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.