Lord v. Bazille
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Order issued from the supreme court upon relation of Fanny Lord, in her awn right and as guardian of Amy Lord, a minor, requiring respondent, as judge of the probate court for Ramsey county, to show cause why a writ of prohibition should not issue-to restrain said court from entertaining jurisdiction of an application made therein to vacate a final decree in the matter of the estate of Samuel D. Lord, deceased, and for permission to file a claim.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Order to show cause why a writ of prohibition should not issue to respondent. Without unnecessary detail, the facts in the case are as follows: One Samuel D. Lord died in November, 1899, and his estate was duly administered in the probate court of Ramsey county, a final decree of distribution having been made, assigning his estate to the persons entitled thereto, on June 25,1901. Subsequent to the entry of the final decree, Charles J. Berryhill, on behalf of himself and another, made application to the probate court of that county to vacate the final decree, reinstate the proceedings, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fern v. LeutholdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Levi v. LonginiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State ex rel. Lasher v. Municipal CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- State ex rel. Townsend v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Estate of KoffelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Vesey v. VeseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- In Re Estate of HaugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Olson v. WitherowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945