State ex rel. Lasher v. Municipal Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Prohibition.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
The'respondent Patterson commenced against the relator, in the municipal court of St. Paul, an action under Gen. St. c. 84, to obtain restitution of real property alleged to have been leased by respondent to the relator, •on the ground that the relator, as alleged, has failed to pay the rent pursuant to the lease. On the return-day of the summons, the relator appeared, and filed an answer setting -forth what he claims to be an equitable defence, which includes a denial of respondent’s title. He thereupon insisted that the court should cease all further proceedings in the action, and certify…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Chesley v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Roberts v. HenseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- In Re Estate of DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- State Ex Rel. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. EnersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State ex rel. Bank of Chadron v. District Court of Weston CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
- State Ex Rel. Jones v. District CourtWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.